Here’s the problem with using the gender-swap Snapchat filter to make female presidents
Some of the most entertaining moments in social media happen with the release of a new Snapchat filter. Recently, Snapchat unveiled a new gender-swap filter, and people were immediately obsessed. Even celebrities took to social media to show off their new alter-egos. But when one viral video used the Snapchat filter on U.S. presidents, Twitter wasn’t pleased.
On May 28th, NowThis tweeted a video that used the “woman” Snapchat filter to make all 45 U.S. presidents look feminine. The presidents were also christened with new feminine-sounding names, such as Barbara Obama, Rashida Nixon, Rhonda Reagan, and Abby Lincoln. In its tweet, NowThis seemed to suggest that the video should be empowering—a way to imagine an alternate history based on a matriarchy rather than a patriarchy.
"These Snapchat filters are giving Americans the women presidents they've never had," the outlet proclaimed in its tweet.
NowThis shared the video again several hours later with a more neutral tweet that read: “Here’s what the U.S. presidents look like through Snapchat’s gender-swap filter.” But the damage had already been done.
Many Twitter users think the video missed the mark.
Some pointed out that it’s insulting to imply that a Snapchat filter can make up for centuries of gender inequality.
Others simply felt the images were cursed.
Snapchat filters are fun to use, and if you want to gender-swap the U.S. presidents, more power to you.
But the government’s overwhelming maleness has caused real problems for anyone who’s not a cisgender man. Recently, several states passed restrictive abortion laws that could cause pregnant people to seek dangerous, illegal abortions. One of the lawmakers behind recent attempted abortion legislation, Ohio State Representative John Becker, has even argued that an ectopic pregnancy can be reimplanted into the uterus, which is definitely not true.
There’s also the fact that Congress has yet to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment—even though it was passed 47 years ago. The bottom line is that we need real representation, not just a fun gender-swap filter.