About Your Privacy on this Site

Welcome! To bring you the best content on our sites and applications, Meredith partners with third party advertisers to serve digital ads, including personalized digital ads. Those advertisers use tracking technologies to collect information about your activity on our sites and applications and across the Internet and your other apps and devices.

You always have the choice to experience our sites without personalized advertising based on your web browsing activity by visiting the DAA’s Consumer Choice page, the NAI's website, and/or the EU online choices page, from each of your browsers or devices. To avoid personalized advertising based on your mobile app activity, you can install the DAA’s AppChoices app here. You can find much more information about your privacy choices in our privacy policy. Even if you choose not to have your activity tracked by third parties for advertising services, you will still see non-personalized ads on our sites and applications. By clicking continue below and using our sites or applications, you agree that we and our third party advertisers can:

  • transfer your data to the United States or other countries; and
  • process and share your data so that we and third parties may serve you with personalized ads, subject to your choices as described above and in our privacy policy.

EU Data Subject Requests

The theory of everything

This “Winnie the Pooh” fan theory is really dark

Disney

Fan theories are always either super exciting or super upsetting — there is no middle ground — and this ‘Winnie the Pooh doesn’t exist’ conspiracy theory is definitely the latter. While obviously he doesn’t exist in the sense that he’s a fictional character, this fan theory circulating goes a step further and posits that all of the characters of the classic stories by A.A. Milne are actually figments of Christopher Robin’s imagination, and what’s more…they all represent different types or facets of mental illness. We’re never sure whether we’re super into conspiracy theories that make childhood faves dark and twisty, or if we really, really dislike them.

It all started with a study published in Canada that pointed out that all of the character exhibit certain traits of psychological conditions, and of course Twitter picked it up.

In this interpretation of the childhood fav, all of Christopher Robin’s imaginary friends personify different aspects of his mental health. We kind of like the idea of turning something that makes your life difficult into cute, cuddly animals that help you solve problems, but we’re also sort of like…can’t they just be cute, cuddly animals?

Still, we definitely see where this theory came from, and have to give it to the folks who devised it — it’s definitely creative, and honestly a whole lot less unsettling than that theory that all of the babies on Rugrats were dead, or whatever. But we still prefer to think that Christopher Robin had REAL talking animal friends he spent his time with, because that sounds a lot less crazy…erm, we think.
Food For Thought

Milk Bar's Christina Tosi wants you to soak your cake in coffee and break this golden tiramisu rule