<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Beyoncé&#8217;s Halftime Show Really Meant For Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hellogiggles.com/what-beyonces-halftime-show-really-meant-for-women/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hellogiggles.com/what-beyonces-halftime-show-really-meant-for-women</link>
	<description>HelloGiggles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 07:11:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily Carlisle</title>
		<link>http://hellogiggles.com/what-beyonces-halftime-show-really-meant-for-women/comment-page-1#comment-156186</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Carlisle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellogiggles.com/?p=132702#comment-156186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a little something to point out...I don&#039;t know if ya&#039;ll have ever danced before, but the thing is is that you can&#039;t wear much. If she were to wear too much clothing, it would weigh down her performance, tire her out faster, and decrease the overall quality of her performance. Though I must also point out three things as well: first- that outfit doesn&#039;t JUST appeal to me, mm-kay? I&#039;m pansexual and WOO she was gorgeous. Second- can we consider that she might&#039;ve wanted- even picked out- that outfit for herself? Because she loved how it felt, it was comfortable, she felt sexy- empowered, even. And third- that what the consensus of holding this performance back from being completely feminist is her outfit and how &quot;skimpy&quot;, or how &quot;not-family-friendly&quot; it looked. This begs these questions: What is wrong with nudity? Why do we get so worked up over breasts? What is so wrong with our bodies that wearing something revealing is taboo? It&#039;s because the body is overtly-sexualized. Breasts- for example- aren&#039;t immediately thought of as baby-bottles anymore; rather, balls of sexy, fatty flesh that hang from a woman&#039;s torso- soft and pliant and pure sex-organy. What are messages like this telling our children? Because at the root of it all, we just don&#039;t want our children (the line starts at about 16 and younger or so) to have sex- for whatever reason you may have. But we are going about it in the wrong way. We can&#039;t just make everything taboo- that&#039;s what makes it sexy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a little something to point out&#8230;I don&#8217;t know if ya&#8217;ll have ever danced before, but the thing is is that you can&#8217;t wear much. If she were to wear too much clothing, it would weigh down her performance, tire her out faster, and decrease the overall quality of her performance. Though I must also point out three things as well: first- that outfit doesn&#8217;t JUST appeal to me, mm-kay? I&#8217;m pansexual and WOO she was gorgeous. Second- can we consider that she might&#8217;ve wanted- even picked out- that outfit for herself? Because she loved how it felt, it was comfortable, she felt sexy- empowered, even. And third- that what the consensus of holding this performance back from being completely feminist is her outfit and how &#8220;skimpy&#8221;, or how &#8220;not-family-friendly&#8221; it looked. This begs these questions: What is wrong with nudity? Why do we get so worked up over breasts? What is so wrong with our bodies that wearing something revealing is taboo? It&#8217;s because the body is overtly-sexualized. Breasts- for example- aren&#8217;t immediately thought of as baby-bottles anymore; rather, balls of sexy, fatty flesh that hang from a woman&#8217;s torso- soft and pliant and pure sex-organy. What are messages like this telling our children? Because at the root of it all, we just don&#8217;t want our children (the line starts at about 16 and younger or so) to have sex- for whatever reason you may have. But we are going about it in the wrong way. We can&#8217;t just make everything taboo- that&#8217;s what makes it sexy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olga Cabrero Vall</title>
		<link>http://hellogiggles.com/what-beyonces-halftime-show-really-meant-for-women/comment-page-1#comment-154737</link>
		<dc:creator>Olga Cabrero Vall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellogiggles.com/?p=132702#comment-154737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think singing a few songs at the half time, dressed in a bodysuit clearly dessigned do please men, the main target audience, means Beyoncé (or any other women, by the way) is &quot;participating&quot;. Where are the female coaches, female comentators etc.? That would be a little closer to participate.

She is playing the only part a woman is supposed to play in a sports show: the cheerleader. A cheerleader with a great voice and a great paycheck (being it in cash or in publicity), that&#039;s for sure, but still it&#039;s only a completment to the main &quot;thing&quot;: football, not music nor fashion.

All female band, all female dancers? That&#039;s exactly the point, female entertaining for a mainly male audience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think singing a few songs at the half time, dressed in a bodysuit clearly dessigned do please men, the main target audience, means Beyoncé (or any other women, by the way) is &#8220;participating&#8221;. Where are the female coaches, female comentators etc.? That would be a little closer to participate.</p>
<p>She is playing the only part a woman is supposed to play in a sports show: the cheerleader. A cheerleader with a great voice and a great paycheck (being it in cash or in publicity), that&#8217;s for sure, but still it&#8217;s only a completment to the main &#8220;thing&#8221;: football, not music nor fashion.</p>
<p>All female band, all female dancers? That&#8217;s exactly the point, female entertaining for a mainly male audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brikena Sela</title>
		<link>http://hellogiggles.com/what-beyonces-halftime-show-really-meant-for-women/comment-page-1#comment-154734</link>
		<dc:creator>Brikena Sela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellogiggles.com/?p=132702#comment-154734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[great post!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire Emery Tassin</title>
		<link>http://hellogiggles.com/what-beyonces-halftime-show-really-meant-for-women/comment-page-1#comment-154704</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire Emery Tassin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellogiggles.com/?p=132702#comment-154704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I generally agree with you but just wanted to point out that the NFL doesn&#039;t actually pay an appearance fee for performers, just covers expenses. Obviously it&#039;s still a net benefit to Beyonce &amp; co in terms of exposure and related spikes in downloads, but it&#039;s not necessarily a &quot;big fat paycheck&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I generally agree with you but just wanted to point out that the NFL doesn&#8217;t actually pay an appearance fee for performers, just covers expenses. Obviously it&#8217;s still a net benefit to Beyonce &amp; co in terms of exposure and related spikes in downloads, but it&#8217;s not necessarily a &#8220;big fat paycheck&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://hellogiggles.com/what-beyonces-halftime-show-really-meant-for-women/comment-page-1#comment-154691</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellogiggles.com/?p=132702#comment-154691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will never deny that Beyonce is one of the most talented singers today, but I&#039;d like to point out that this is the same woman who wrote an entire song slut-shaming another girl, including lyrics calling the woman &quot;nasty&quot; and &quot;stanky&quot;, &quot;trashy&quot;, &quot;sleezy&quot;, and &quot;Swore you look cute girl in them dukes/ Booty all out lookin&#039; trashy&quot;, as well as &quot;Booty all out, tongue out her mouth/ Cleavage from here to Mexico/ She walks wit a twist, one hand on her hip&quot;.

She spends the whole song slut-shaming another woman for wearing skimpy clothes, then goes and poses for GQ magazine and other publications wearing a thong and a half-shirt that exposes the bottom half of her breasts. I don&#039;t have a problem with her posing for magazine covers; if she&#039;s confident in her figure, she should be able to flaunt it. But her hypocrisy stinks.

I was completely amazed by her earth-shattering performance at the Super Bowl and I was screaming when Destiny&#039;s Child popped up, but I still can&#039;t get past the fact that, with all of her &quot;good-girl Diva&quot; facade, she sure has a history of contradicting herself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will never deny that Beyonce is one of the most talented singers today, but I&#8217;d like to point out that this is the same woman who wrote an entire song slut-shaming another girl, including lyrics calling the woman &#8220;nasty&#8221; and &#8220;stanky&#8221;, &#8220;trashy&#8221;, &#8220;sleezy&#8221;, and &#8220;Swore you look cute girl in them dukes/ Booty all out lookin&#8217; trashy&#8221;, as well as &#8220;Booty all out, tongue out her mouth/ Cleavage from here to Mexico/ She walks wit a twist, one hand on her hip&#8221;.</p>
<p>She spends the whole song slut-shaming another woman for wearing skimpy clothes, then goes and poses for GQ magazine and other publications wearing a thong and a half-shirt that exposes the bottom half of her breasts. I don&#8217;t have a problem with her posing for magazine covers; if she&#8217;s confident in her figure, she should be able to flaunt it. But her hypocrisy stinks.</p>
<p>I was completely amazed by her earth-shattering performance at the Super Bowl and I was screaming when Destiny&#8217;s Child popped up, but I still can&#8217;t get past the fact that, with all of her &#8220;good-girl Diva&#8221; facade, she sure has a history of contradicting herself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Cowan</title>
		<link>http://hellogiggles.com/what-beyonces-halftime-show-really-meant-for-women/comment-page-1#comment-154688</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 20:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellogiggles.com/?p=132702#comment-154688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I somewhat agree with you, and I wish women could always get by on talent alone. But, at the same time, I wish everyone would get over the &quot;skimpy cladness&quot; of Beyonce, or any woman who has an amazing body who is confident enough to show it off. Why is it that women get ragged on for showing some thighs and cleavage, when I&#039;ve *never* heard a man get the same criticism of not being modest enough. Why must women always have a restrictive idea of modesty? Why must women always worry about whether they looks too &quot;slutty&quot; or not. I&#039;m not saying everyone should dress like porn stars, but I definitely feel like women get judged way too quickly and easily for what they decide to wear. And I think other women are the harshest critics. So, basically, what I&#039;m saying is, yeah, it feels degrading when a woman&#039;s body and sexuality is used to make money, which is really common in pop culture. But, on the flip side, if a woman decides for herself she wants to show some skin, should we really judge her too harshly? As an artist/performer/whatever, shouldn&#039;t Beyonce be free to show her body if she wants? There really has to be a balance somewhere, right? When it comes to Beyonce&#039;s &quot;costume,&quot; it was tasteful and fit with the style and theme of her music. It matched her desired image of being powerful, confident, and sexy, and overall enhanced her already amazing performance and talent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I somewhat agree with you, and I wish women could always get by on talent alone. But, at the same time, I wish everyone would get over the &#8220;skimpy cladness&#8221; of Beyonce, or any woman who has an amazing body who is confident enough to show it off. Why is it that women get ragged on for showing some thighs and cleavage, when I&#8217;ve *never* heard a man get the same criticism of not being modest enough. Why must women always have a restrictive idea of modesty? Why must women always worry about whether they looks too &#8220;slutty&#8221; or not. I&#8217;m not saying everyone should dress like porn stars, but I definitely feel like women get judged way too quickly and easily for what they decide to wear. And I think other women are the harshest critics. So, basically, what I&#8217;m saying is, yeah, it feels degrading when a woman&#8217;s body and sexuality is used to make money, which is really common in pop culture. But, on the flip side, if a woman decides for herself she wants to show some skin, should we really judge her too harshly? As an artist/performer/whatever, shouldn&#8217;t Beyonce be free to show her body if she wants? There really has to be a balance somewhere, right? When it comes to Beyonce&#8217;s &#8220;costume,&#8221; it was tasteful and fit with the style and theme of her music. It matched her desired image of being powerful, confident, and sexy, and overall enhanced her already amazing performance and talent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Alan Bennett</title>
		<link>http://hellogiggles.com/what-beyonces-halftime-show-really-meant-for-women/comment-page-1#comment-154685</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Alan Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellogiggles.com/?p=132702#comment-154685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me start with one of the few points we agree on: Beyonce&#039;s performance was a spectacular display of show(wo)manship and talent. I was floored. 

Does it matter that in the past 10 years of a television spectacle that is primarily an excuse to make tons of money off of it&#039;s audience through advertisements only half of the halftime performances have featured female performers.? And that if you extend that time frame to include the early 2000s as well, the number only grows in favor of female performers. I don&#039;t feel that this is mis-representative of any demographic. The Super Bowl, and it&#039;s advertisements and production, are not aimed at primarily at women. Women, and their viewership,  are a marginal benefit to this event that can be coaxed into watching via female-friendly advertisements and halftime shows. If you asked the majority of viewers of the Super Bowl if they had any interest in Beyonce&#039;s performance, I&#039;m sure you would get quite a bit of disinterest and more than a few outright negatives. 

And no, you don&#039;t have much of an option in regards to the Superbowl. It&#039;s not an event that is tailored to appeal to or involve you. You don&#039;t hear rednecks complaining about being underrepresented in the &quot;Vagina Monologues&quot; do you? Maybe that is a poor example, but there are plenty more. I personally think more rednecks could benefit from seeing that life-changing show.

Where are the female commentators, referees or coaches? Not being hired, clearly. The majority of commentators and coaches all have experience playing the sport. You don&#039;t hire someone who doesn&#039;t have the necessary experience. If women want to start getting football related jobs, they need to start playing football or involving themselves with the business of football itself. For example, it would be difficult for me to get a job selling cars if I knew little to nothing about cars. When it comes to the skimpy outfits, you know as well as I do that that has nothing to do with football. That is advertising. They are appealing to their target audience: college and middle aged men.

Now we come to Beyonce&#039;s performance, which I will admit was incredible. I am not a fan of her music, or of pop music in general. But I know a performer when I see one and you would have been hard pressed to have put on a better halftime show than I saw that night. Madonna certainly tried last year, but I was bored to tears. Don&#039;t get me started on Tom Petty in 2008. But if you weren&#039;t expecting the rest of Destiny&#039;s Child to show up, you just don&#039;t keep up with the news. It&#039;s been plastered everywhere that they are collaborating again.  Didn&#039;t they release a song on YouTube a few weeks ago? It&#039;s all about money, once again.

As for the all-female band....awesome. Gimmick-y, but awesome. She wanted to send a message and we got it, but there is no need to beat us over the head with it.

In conclusion, I don&#039;t feel that Beyonce taught us anything, nor was it ever her intention do so. She earned her big-fat-paycheck by putting on the best halftime show that I&#039;ve seen in a decade. But it wasn&#039;t a feminist cry to her sisters. It was a spectacle. It was &quot;girl power.&quot; It was a means of getting more viewers to watch the Super Bowl....and it worked.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me start with one of the few points we agree on: Beyonce&#8217;s performance was a spectacular display of show(wo)manship and talent. I was floored. </p>
<p>Does it matter that in the past 10 years of a television spectacle that is primarily an excuse to make tons of money off of it&#8217;s audience through advertisements only half of the halftime performances have featured female performers.? And that if you extend that time frame to include the early 2000s as well, the number only grows in favor of female performers. I don&#8217;t feel that this is mis-representative of any demographic. The Super Bowl, and it&#8217;s advertisements and production, are not aimed at primarily at women. Women, and their viewership,  are a marginal benefit to this event that can be coaxed into watching via female-friendly advertisements and halftime shows. If you asked the majority of viewers of the Super Bowl if they had any interest in Beyonce&#8217;s performance, I&#8217;m sure you would get quite a bit of disinterest and more than a few outright negatives. </p>
<p>And no, you don&#8217;t have much of an option in regards to the Superbowl. It&#8217;s not an event that is tailored to appeal to or involve you. You don&#8217;t hear rednecks complaining about being underrepresented in the &#8220;Vagina Monologues&#8221; do you? Maybe that is a poor example, but there are plenty more. I personally think more rednecks could benefit from seeing that life-changing show.</p>
<p>Where are the female commentators, referees or coaches? Not being hired, clearly. The majority of commentators and coaches all have experience playing the sport. You don&#8217;t hire someone who doesn&#8217;t have the necessary experience. If women want to start getting football related jobs, they need to start playing football or involving themselves with the business of football itself. For example, it would be difficult for me to get a job selling cars if I knew little to nothing about cars. When it comes to the skimpy outfits, you know as well as I do that that has nothing to do with football. That is advertising. They are appealing to their target audience: college and middle aged men.</p>
<p>Now we come to Beyonce&#8217;s performance, which I will admit was incredible. I am not a fan of her music, or of pop music in general. But I know a performer when I see one and you would have been hard pressed to have put on a better halftime show than I saw that night. Madonna certainly tried last year, but I was bored to tears. Don&#8217;t get me started on Tom Petty in 2008. But if you weren&#8217;t expecting the rest of Destiny&#8217;s Child to show up, you just don&#8217;t keep up with the news. It&#8217;s been plastered everywhere that they are collaborating again.  Didn&#8217;t they release a song on YouTube a few weeks ago? It&#8217;s all about money, once again.</p>
<p>As for the all-female band&#8230;.awesome. Gimmick-y, but awesome. She wanted to send a message and we got it, but there is no need to beat us over the head with it.</p>
<p>In conclusion, I don&#8217;t feel that Beyonce taught us anything, nor was it ever her intention do so. She earned her big-fat-paycheck by putting on the best halftime show that I&#8217;ve seen in a decade. But it wasn&#8217;t a feminist cry to her sisters. It was a spectacle. It was &#8220;girl power.&#8221; It was a means of getting more viewers to watch the Super Bowl&#8230;.and it worked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CL Mealy</title>
		<link>http://hellogiggles.com/what-beyonces-halftime-show-really-meant-for-women/comment-page-1#comment-154677</link>
		<dc:creator>CL Mealy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hellogiggles.com/?p=132702#comment-154677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I loved her guitarist.  Before the Superbowl I was totally unaware that Beyonce toured with an all-female band.  And they aren&#039;t just pretty chicks holding instruments - they are actually accomplished musicians.  How refreshing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved her guitarist.  Before the Superbowl I was totally unaware that Beyonce toured with an all-female band.  And they aren&#8217;t just pretty chicks holding instruments &#8211; they are actually accomplished musicians.  How refreshing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
